In our lab, we often see how small errors in specimen analysis can lead to significant implications for patient care. Just last week, a miscalculation in a blood test resulted in an unnecessary treatment for a dog, causing stress for the owner. I’m curious how others ensure accuracy in their results, especially with high-volume tests.
I totally get where you’re coming from. During high-volume tests, I always double-check with a second set of eyes before finalizing results. Just last month, we caught an error in a CBC that could’ve led to undue treatment, and it made all the difference.
Always wise to verify results — i sometimes double-check against control samples, which can help catch issues early. Have you considered that?